Martijn Otto
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The list from Derek shows only 2 RSI names, all the others are CIG. So moving everything formally to RSI International UK (and then killing all the others CIG companies) might be their way to move money out of USA / sight. Especially if they create a whole new entity in the UK.
The above mentioned TOS however, states this:
“To exercise the right of withdrawal, you must inform us (Roberts Space Industries International Limited, Freedom House, Church Street, Wilmslow, SK9 1AX, United Kingdom, [email protected]) of your decision to withdraw from these Terms of Service by an unequivocal statement (e.g. a letter sent by post, or e-mail) during the Withdrawal Period. You may use the attached model withdrawal form, but it is not obligatory.”
So RSI UK can be reached via e-mail with an CIG address. So killing all other CIG companies probably won’t hold up in court…
Yes, but if they don’t have to report over the time before switching to the UK, they could hide a lot of money from the backers
Somebody noticed this too:
“Do you also find it interesting that the new ToS doesn’t even seem to mention CIG anywhere only “RSI” and “RSI Services”?”
But backers paid CIG, not RSI. This change has to be part of a another scheme, but I don’t see how yet…
Yeah, the bubble is finally about to burst. The new TOS is a desperate attempt by CIG/RSI to hold on to all the received money without ever having to give it back or account for it. And by signing in on their website you already agreed to the new TOS. Endgame is up folks 🙂
“YOU AGREE, THEREFORE, THAT YOU WILL NEVER ASSERT OR BRING ANY CLAIM OR SUIT AGAINST RSI, ITS PARENT COMPANY, DIVISIONS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, OR ANY EMPLOYEES OF ANY OF ABOVE, WHICH IS RELATED TO OR BASED ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO; (I) A CLAIM THAT YOU “OWN” ANY VIRTUAL GOODS IN THE GAME, (II) A CLAIM FOR THE “VALUE” OF VIRTUAL GOODS IF RSI DELETES THEM (AND/OR TERMINATES YOUR ACCOUNT) WITH A REASONABLE CAUSE AT RSI’S SOLE DISCRETION”
“However, you acknowledge and agree that delivery as of such date is not a firm promise and may be extended by RSI since unforeseen events may extend the development and/or production time.”
“you agree that any Pledge amounts applied against the Pledge Item Cost and the Game Cost shall be non-refundable regardless of whether or not RSI is able to complete and deliver the Game and/or the pledge items”
“You acknowledge and agree that the Game and the pledge items delivered to you may differ in certain aspects from the description of the Game and those pledge items that was available on the Website at the time of your Pledge.”
I really am looking forward to see what happens next with this little gem: The Drake Dragonfly will go on sale Friday, June 17th at a price of $35.
How much income will this next picture generate CIG?
More fun on the way, 2.4 is now available foor all backers for a final series of test: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/332278/sc-alpha-2-4-0-on-the-ptu-for-all-backers
Note the word final 🙂
Looks like they are desperately trying to get some working kind of game out in the real world so they have some kind of defence for themselves.
Luckily, there’s always forum rule 7b:
“Even assuming what the OP is quoting is true, forum rule 7b requests people not to discuss Customer Service interaction”<br style=”text-align: left; font-family: Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;” /><br style=”text-align: left; font-family: Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;” />Thread closed
That went quick:
“Question answered thread closed. Further more several posts were removed under forum rules 1, 3, 4, 7 and 9. Kindly note that its absolutely fine to be critical and have an opposing opinion. As long as speculation isnt provided as fact and as long as people are civil. Theres no need to attack the critics. If you have doubts about a post just flag it”
They did leave most of the topic intact though. Do they actually think that when deleting this kind of topics, the problem doesn’t excist?
