« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 41   Go Down

Author Topic: CryTek v CIG/RSI  (Read 531530 times)

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #75 on: February 11, 2018, 10:11:36 AM »
Quote from: N0mad on February 11, 2018, 10:03:06 AM
That's interesting. One would think that the UK Treasury would want proof that the Tax Credits are going towards the "British" game they are expecting (SQ42), not to assets which are going to be used in a different game (SC).

I did notice a post from Juicy_K_Girl in Sc/refunds a few weeks back:

Has anyone heard anything more about this? (or is anyone a UK lawyer who could find out?)

It's rubbish. Just ignore it. That Juicy_K_Girl person is a total flake who thus far hasn't posted anything of relevance or consequence.
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

Bubba

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #76 on: February 11, 2018, 03:08:52 PM »
Intriguing, what was not said. Or maybe what was said and then unsaid. Or maybe what should have been said, but wasn't. You know you're big time when your counsel's on call on weekends.

But seriously folks, don't take Juicy seriously. #1 rule in legal actions is the rule of Tuco: "If you're gonna shoot, shoot. Don't talk."
Or just the rule from when I was younger: there are two groups: those who talk about getting laid and those who don't. Guess which one is getting laid?

If they're talking, they've got no knowledge of any upcoming legal actions. If you are talking and do, shut up and don't hit the post button.
Logged

nightfire

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #77 on: February 12, 2018, 12:27:47 PM »
Quote from: Bubba on February 11, 2018, 03:08:52 PM
You know you're big time when your counsel's on call on weekends.

Haha, not necessarily. My counsel's on call on weekends because that's the only time they have to deal with my stuff. During the week, they work on important cases  :10bux:
Logged

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #78 on: February 12, 2018, 12:39:30 PM »
Hey! Who remembers when I totally called this one?

Remember our pandering pal, Leonard French?

Jan 7th, 2018 @ 38:28


Quote
"this [Motion to Dismiss] sounds like a knock-out punch to me"

Feb 12, 2018 @ 01:31


Quote
"I really don't know which way this one's gonna go. If I'm gonna put my money on it...and I'm not...I'm gonna give it odds towards that the motion to dismiss gets denied and the case continues for further adjudication. Whether that be into discovery or what, I expect there to be a denial of the motion to dismiss. I'm not predicting that as a hundred percent though - I'm going 60/40 on that"

I did say that despite being entitled to his opinions, it seems like he was just pandering to the Cognitive Dissonance of the backer base who have been parroting that nonsense since Dec when he started chiming in on the case.

He is at 60/40.  I remain 100% ALL IN that the MtD is going to get DENIED out of hand. What remains to be seen is how much - if any - of it survives at all.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 04:55:10 PM by dsmart »
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

jwh1701

  • Guest
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #79 on: February 12, 2018, 05:33:54 PM »
Quote from: dsmart on February 12, 2018, 12:39:30 PM
Hey! Who remembers when I totally called this one?

Definitely called it and not withstanding asking for money a like CR, and now hes backtracking like CR.
Logged

StanTheMan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #80 on: February 12, 2018, 05:40:04 PM »
The "knock out punch" turned out to be a cock out Hot Lunch for French, as he left himself exposed, and was forced to eat someone elses shit.

As for his 60/40...and without reading up on this judge as Derek says he has done, you would give any randomly selected case being brought by legal professionals,  a 90:10 of failing a MTD.

60:40 is a kin long way from a hundred percent and it is close enough to 50:50 to make Frenchies opinion exceptionally cowardly.

« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 05:51:51 PM by StanTheMan »
Logged

Penny579

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #81 on: February 14, 2018, 03:37:27 AM »
 :lol:
As an expert on the matter, It's rare that I am wrong on this subject. I can also say with certaintany that flipping a coin is worth more than my opinion.  It's as accurate and you also have the coin which is nice.
Logged

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #82 on: February 14, 2018, 04:40:19 PM »
Quote from: Penny579 on February 14, 2018, 03:37:27 AM
:lol:
As an expert on the matter, It's rare that I am wrong on this subject. I can also say with certaintany that flipping a coin is worth more than my opinion.  It's as accurate and you also have the coin which is nice.

imo, you should take the Bar exam, please clearly you will do a better job than French  :vince:
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

StanTheMan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #83 on: February 22, 2018, 05:24:47 PM »
When are we expecting the next  developments in the case ?
Logged

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #84 on: February 22, 2018, 06:13:18 PM »
Quote from: StanTheMan on February 22, 2018, 05:24:47 PM
When are we expecting the next  developments in the case ?

Until the judge rules on the MtD, nothing is going to happen. That could be weeks or months.
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

Motto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #85 on: February 23, 2018, 10:12:32 AM »
The judge is probably also waiting on Derek's next big thing reveal. She is hoping CIG will collapse so she won't have to deal with all the idiots.
Logged

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #86 on: February 24, 2018, 07:29:21 AM »
Quote from: Motto on February 23, 2018, 10:12:32 AM
The judge is probably also waiting on Derek's next big thing reveal. She is hoping CIG will collapse so she won't have to deal with all the idiots.

 :emot-laffo: :emot-laffo:
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #87 on: February 28, 2018, 05:55:14 AM »
OP updated with latest Crytek filing. My analysis coming later today.
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

Motto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #88 on: February 28, 2018, 06:13:16 AM »
Better not make a hodgepodge out of it  :police:
Logged

jwh1701

  • Guest
Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Reply #89 on: February 28, 2018, 08:00:01 AM »
Reading through it the judge was harsh towards crytek, but I suppose they really need discovery to help prove its accusations. 5-10 years for the case :(

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 41   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk