Where do you people get the 13.5k per person estimate from?
It's an industry wide rule of thumb for guessetimating the total budget of a project.
If you have a staff of x and think a project will take y months to deliver, then the total budget you should allocate will be about $13.5k per man month. That accounts for pay and benefits....rent...power...licenses...equipment...and so on. So x * y * $13.5k would be the total budget.
Actual costs may be higher or lower but it is seen as a useful rule of thumb.
My personal guess for the seeked compensation would be more based upon a percentage of the sales, than what they got from Amazon for their engine. Which sounds about right, as i don't think the licensing fees are that high for a normale license, when compared towards a percentage of that 170m, or even the 150m or so they'd reached when they switched engines.
In the end it's still just speculating without any idea what their contract really said.
A lot will depend on the GLA but I think it more likely CryTek want a settlement...one that gives them cash and protects their IP.
However...it must also be remembered that CIG used exCryTek developers to modify CryEngine into a "new" engine they named Star Engine and refused to share those changes with CryTek. Amazon paid $70 million for that privilege.
CryTek probably isn't going to be looking for that amount.
But they will want a payment and they will want their IP protected.
Best outcome for CIG would be for them to hand over the optimizations for CryEngine they promised to provide, to give CryTek a payment that reflects list revenue AND punitive damages and that CryTek gives them time to switch over their entire system to LumberYard...maybe 3-6 months.
Well...unless CIG has some document freeing them from the GLA